Bismillah
     *****************  ©Hadji Datu Jamal Ashley Yahya Abbas *****************      
***************************************

Blogroll




Datu Jamal

Datu Jamal Ashley Yahya Abbas


at home in Marawi City

email
EMAIL ME


******************* COMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY CONSULTANT
===================




Top Blogs


************
“The pen of the scholar is mightier than the sword of the martyr.” – Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.)
************


"There can be no liberty for a community which lacks the information by which to detect lies." - Walter Lippman

************


"That we are to follow a President whether he is right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, it is morally treasonable to the people" - Thomas Jefferson
************


"Humans have no nature, only history" — Robin Collingwood
************


"The territories of a Homeland is not subject to the will of illegal occupants."
************


"Who we ARE is who we WERE." - John Quincy Adams
************


Most Recent Posts


Most Popular Posts

WAR IN MORO LAND (Last...: 10
100 Greatest Men: 9
FILIPINO CRAB MENTALITY -...: 4



Other Links
Donncha

Barahaman: Forgotten Sultan of Mindanao

Memories of a Forgotten War : Reconstructing History

Demonizing the 'Enemy'

Bush’s ‘War on Terrorism’ Propaganda Scores Big in RP

Kalayaan College


*********************
Custom Search

*********************






ZTE-FG Deal


BUKOL RINGTONE



******************

9/11 REVISITED

******************



Bangsa Moro --Muslims in the Philippines



Philippine Crossraods




**********************
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.
**********************



html hit counters
Get a free hit counter .



SINCE APRIL 2, 2007







March 30, 2007

Anagrams – The Secrets behind the Names | # | Miscellaneous — jamalashley @ 12:17 pm

According to the esoteric sciences, NAMES and even words are sacred. There are secrets buried in words. In the Christian Bible, the Gospel of John begins with the verse “In the Beginning was the Word; the Word was in God’s presence, and the Word was God.”

 

In the Qur’an, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Humankind was/is commanded to “Read in the name of your Lord… Read! For your Lord is Most Generous, Who teaches by means of the Pen, teaches Man(kind) what he knows not.” (96, 1-5)

 

And so we must read the words. And we must read not only between the lines but what lies hidden in those words.

 

In Numerology, each letter corresponds to a number. The Arabic, Jewish and Latin alphabets have corresponding numbers. For centuries, many Arabs, Jews and Europeans have been trying to decipher the secrets of names and words through their numerical counterparts. By calculating the number according to some equations, the name’s properties, and hence, the destiny of the bearer of the name can be discovered.

 

For those not mathematically inclined, there is another mystical procedure to uncover / discover the secrets of Names. This is called Lexigram. The procedure is simple: write down all the words that can be made out of the given letters of the particular name(s).  Then create sentences out of these words.

 

ANAGRAMS

 

Another method is the Anagram. An ANAGRAM is word or phrase formed by transporting the letters of another word or phrase. All the letters in the original word or phrase must be used in the anagram with nothing added or left out.

 

Anagram-making became a very popular pastime during the Middle Ages in Europe. Thus, many people consider it merely as a game and do not give it the same mystical stature as the lexigrams.

 

But the fact that it has gone beyond being esoteric or occult and became common practice can only attest to its credibility.

 

In Lexigrams, a name or set of names can have hundreds of sub-words and thousands of sentences can be made from those words. For example, the name George Bush contains 111 words – from the interjection O! to 7-letter words like buggers and re-house. You can imagine how many sentences you can make by re-arranging 111 words. One sample sentence is ‘He buggers rogues.’ It is therefore no wonder that the Bush administration loves calling its perceived enemies like North Korea and Iran as “rogue states”.

 

For anagrams, the choice is limited. All the letters must be used, nothing added nor left out. It is simpler and more to the point. In the Occult, like in Physics, the simpler method or theory is always preferred. There is also perfect symmetry because the word and its anagram use the very same letters. For this reason, anagrams are written with an equal sign (=). Thus, ‘George Bush’ = ‘He bugs Gore’.  For anagrams that complete the sentence, a tilde sign (~) is used.

           

SIMPLE AND TRUE

 

When one finds an anagram, there is usually a sense of awe and wonder at its Simple yet Profound Truth.  You can immediately agree with the principle in the Occult that says, “There is no coincidence in the Universe”. When you see the anagram equation ‘George Bush’ = ‘He bugs Gore’, you wonder if Bush was really destined to win the electoral votes yet lose the popular votes, which presumably bugs Gore eternally.

 

What do you think of this anagram – ‘President George W. Bush’ = ‘This bugger needs power’ ? Or this, ‘President Bush of the USA’ = ‘A fresh one, but he’s stupid’

 

A look at some of the anagrams of famous people further lends credibility to their simple truthfulness: (from http://www.anagrammy.com/)

 

Adolf Hitler. = ‘Heil, old fart!’ (Jean Fontaine, 1998)*  

Milosevic = ‘Cos I’m evil’ (Larry Brash, 1999)

Chairman Mao. = ‘I am on a march’ (Mick Tully, 1998, Wayne Baisley, 1999)

Diana, The Princess of Wales = ‘Elton’s idea is crap. He fawns’ (Larry Brash, 1998)

Elvis Aaron Presley. = Seen alive? Sorry, pal! (Bourke, 1999)

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. = A famous German waltz god. (Jones, 1999)

Thomas Alva Edison = Aha! Ions made volts! (Larry Brash, 1999)

William Shakespeare = I’ll make a wise phrase. (Grantham, 2000) or

                                    = He’s like a lamp, I swear, or

                                    = speaks well, I hear. (Dent, 2005)

Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy = O, it’s a lovely thick novel! (Grantham, 2000)

The Israeli general, Moshe Dayan = Hail, great hairless one-eyed man! (Richard Grantham, 2000)

Sir Peter Paul Rubens = Superb painter rules. (Jaybur, 2000)

 

(The names in parentheses are the people who worked out the anagrams and the year they registered their “discoveries”. For the anagrams I worked on, I put MINE inside the parenthesis.)*

 

And look how uncanny these anagrams are: (from http://www.anagrammy.com/)

 

Medicinal marijuana  = A cure? I’m in a damn jail. (Larry Brash, 1999)

The great pyramid of Cheops = My God! Perfect Pharaoh site! (Richard Brodie, 2000)

Harley Davidson Motorcycles = Very costly old road machines. (Larry Brash, 2000)

Seven Eleven Incorporated = Open it and never ever close! (Meyran Kraus, 2001)

Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei = The elite pure-racist Hitler-based Nazi association. (Richard Grantham, 2001)

United States of America = Mac and Fries Eat-out Site. (Larry Brash, 2001)

A Nintendo Gameboy = Made to be annoying. (James H. Young, 2001)

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome = Uproar over recent mystery disease. (Richard Grantham, 2003)

The National Rifle Association = Fanatical loonies are into this. (Chris Doyle, 2004)

Castle, knight, armour… = King Arthur’s Camelot. (Adrian Hickford, 2005)

The Leaning Tower of Pisa = I spot one giant flaw here… (Meyran Kraus, 2005)

Microsoft Help and Support Website = Stupid patch! Problem is often worse! (Meyran Kraus, 2006)

 

THE PHILIPPINES

 

The name ‘Philippines’ anagrams to ‘I ship nipple’ (Mary Ann 2003). Is this connected to the mail-order brides the Philippines are famous for? Another anagram pertains to the male genital. Is this any indication about the people’s attitudes towards sexuality? I uncovered another anagram which says ‘The Philippines = ‘I help thin pipes’ (mine) but I have no idea what it could mean.

 

‘Republic of the Philippinesanagrams to ‘Feeblish, prophetic pupil in’ (mine). Could this refer to the psychic but feeble Filipino who is considered by foreigners as a mere pupil? It must be noted that under the 350-year Spanish rule, the Christianized Filipino native was considered a perpetual legal minor. The Spanish priest or the military governors acted as the guardians of the Filipino natives.

 

‘Republic of the Philippines’ also anagrams to ‘Hi! Topple fine republic ship!’ (mine) It is therefore no wonder that the Republic created by Aguinaldo and the Katipunan was easily toppled and so was the Republic created by the Japanese during World War II. The third Republic seems more stable. The Communists and the military putschists tried and are still trying to topple the fine republic.

 

The Moros do not want to destroy the Republic. They simply want to separate from it.

 

President Marcos dreamed of changing the Filipinos and called his utopia, ‘The New Society’, which anagrams to ‘Chinese wet toy’ (mine). The Chinese flourished during the Marcos regime and many Chinese nobodies became rich tycoons. The New Society became their wet toy.

 

President Arroyo wanted a ‘Strong Republic‘, which anagrams to ‘Corpse blurting’(mine). The country is now famous for its extra-judicial killings of journalists and leftists.

 

PRESIDENTS AND LADIES

 

‘Ferdinand Edralin Marcos’ anagrams to ‘Aced informer drains land’ (Mary Ann 1987).  So maybe it is true that Marcos drained the country of so much wealth. It also anagrams to ‘Fair, damned scorn’ (mine) or  ~‘red, mad, infernal, sardonic’ (mine)

 

His widow’s name has very interesting anagrams: ‘Imelda Romualdez Marcos’ = ‘A lurid sole-crazed momma’ (Mesterton-Gibbons) (2007) = ‘Our mild sole-crazed mama’ (by Pinchas). No wonder there was so much fuss about her shoes!

 

Her detractors might also rejoice in this anagram: ‘Imelda Romualdez Marcos’ = ‘Demoralized amoral scum’ (by Jewell 2005)

 

I worked out Fidel V Ramos’s anagram to ‘Favored, slim’(mine). We all know that he was favored (anointed) by Cory Aquino and he won the presidency by a very slim margin.

 

Joseph Estrada has ‘Oh, sad jeep star’(mine). Indeed, the movie star’s jeep (Jeepney ni Erap) has a sad journey.

 

Estrada should always use Erap instead of Joseph. The anagram ‘Erap Estrada’ ~ ‘as rare Adept’ (mine) - has a much better ring to it.

 

In spite of having only 6 letters, the name Gloria has quite a number of anagrams: ‘Oil Rag’ = ‘O Grail’ = ‘Air Log’ = ‘Rio Gal’ = ‘Go Lira’ (all by Jewell 2005) = ‘Go, Liar!’ (Domingo Marcelo 2005) = OA Girl.

 

President Arroyo’s critics claim that she lied about the so-called Garci tapes, the election fraud, etc. Well, ‘Gloria Arroyo’ anagrams to ‘Oy, Go roar, Liar!’ (mine)

 

Her complete name ‘Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’, which she prefers to use, anagrams to ‘G.A., carry amoral apologia’ (mine). She did make a public apology. Because of that apology, critics like former Senator Saguisag say she had lost whatever moral ascendancy she had had. For others, she was just being true to her name – ‘Gloria’ = ‘Go, Liar’.

 

The www.hotmanila.ph website has the anagram ‘President Gloria Arroyo’ = ‘No leader, a sorry pig riot’. But I worked out this anagram: ‘President Gloria Arroyo’ = ‘O, a Tory leader’s iron grip’ (mine). This means that some people see her as a sorry leader while others recognize her as a conservative leader with an iron grip on Philippine politics.

 

Malacanang supported a campaign drive that called for Charter Change. It was known as People’s Initiative. According to the hotmanila website, ‘People’s Initiative’ = ‘O, I spin a petite evil’.

 

Vice President Noli de Castro’s name anagrams to ‘randiest cool’ (mine) or ‘consider a lot’ (mine) or ‘star idol once’ (mine). It is easy to agree that the Vice President is ‘cool’.  But it seems that he is only a ‘star idol once’. The next time he runs, he won’t be as lucky. Because he is the Vice President, people are thinking twice or thrice before joining any anti-Arroyo impeachment campaign. It appears that people have to ‘consider a lot’ when it comes to de Castro becoming the next President.

 

BANGSA MORO

 

Anagrammatically, ‘Bangsa Moro’ = ‘Gas on Rambo!’ (mine) Perhaps this is a clue to the mental attitude of Moros.

 

But ‘Mindanao’ = ‘A damn ion’ = ‘A mad anion’ (mine). An ion is a group of atoms that has lost or gained an electron. It is thus unstable. An anion is a negatively charged ion.

 

The anagram ‘Mindanao = I, Madonna’ (mine) can have serious implications. If the Moros won’t get their act together, Mindanao might eventually become totally Christian.

 

Perhaps Muslim Mindanao and Sulu should be called ‘Bangsa Moro Sultanates’ which anagrams to ‘O! Natural boss magnates’. The Moros would be back to being bosses of their destinies.

 

‘Nur Misuari’ = ‘U.S. ruin amir’. According to reports, the U.S. pressured Libya to pressure Misuari to agree to a Final Peace Agreement. Misuari, who used to be treated by OIC countries as an Amir of the Bangsa Moro state, ended up in detention and is treated by the Philippine government like a criminal.

 

But all is not lost for Mr. Misuari. His name’s anagrams include = ‘Uranium, Sir’ = ‘I, Uranus rim’ = ‘I, Mr. Uranus, I’

 

I have always wondered what the secret behind Misuari is. From his name’s anagram, it is now apparent. Mr. Misuari seems to have an affinity with the planet Uranus. According to astrologers, Uranus is the “ruler” of revolutions. And so the anagram ‘Nur Misuari’ = ‘I, Mr. Uranus, I’ has come to mean “ Nur Misuari is Mr. Bangsa Moro revolution”

 

And in 2007, Uranus is quite prominent in the skies. The Moon occults (whatever that means) Uranus in February and again in May (when Misuari might be the government’s candidate for the ARMM governorship).

 

In Sept. 11, the solar eclipse opposes Uranus. Astrologers say that this will bring in similar “vibrations” as in the Uranus-Pluto conjunction of the mid-1960s. So we might just see the old Nur Misuari back – acting like the Nur of his idealist days at UP!

 

Unfortunately, the anagrams of Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) are all horrible. I won’t even bother to write them. Besides, the Moro-haters might start using these anagrams to malign these groups. Perhaps it is about time that both Moro fronts realize that they have to totally change in order to adapt to changing times. They can start by changing their names.

 

On the brighter side, George Bush’s ‘War on Terror’ would only lead him to a ‘narrower rot’.

 

Well, what are you waiting for? Discover the secret behind your name. Remember, there is NO coincidence in the Universe.

===========================

* (The names in parentheses are the people who worked out the anagrams and the year they registered their “discoveries”. I think one can register through the Internet. For the anagrams I worked on, I put MINE inside the parenthesis. Frankly, I think it is childish and presumptuous to put one’s name. Who could really say who first figured out the anagrams? Surely, hundreds of people already worked out Shakespeare’s name’s anagram even before 100 years ago. But, one must follow protocol even how foolish it is.)

 

       — ‘Datu Jamal Ashley Yahya Abbas’ = ‘Aha! Aha! Laudably as by majesty’

                                                         = ‘Aha! Aha! Ably as by auld majesty’

 

March 29, 2007

“Hello” Garci for Congress, ‘Robin Hood’ hostage-taker, etc | # | Current events, Socio-Political, Philipine Elections — jamalashley @ 5:32 am

 

The day before yesterday,  I almost puked when I saw President Arroyo declaring on TV, “ I do not tolerate human rights abuses.” How in the world could she say that with a straight face?  Almost everything happening in this country is in violation of basic human rights.

HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES

The freedom of assembly is already gone. This is a basic human right enshrined in our very Constitution. Arroyo’s police prevent the people from going to the streets to air their grievances.

The people are hungry. There is no work for the vast majority. The people have to leave the country, and their loved ones, in order to have a job. It is basic for any citizen to have a means of livelihood.

Without these poor workers’ remittances, the government budget would be in the red. Yet most of these workers’ rights are violated everyday in many countries but they could not expect any help from their embassies. I know. I have seen with my own eyes how the Philippine embassies abroad maltreat Filipino OFWs..

The military is occupying most of Muslim Mindanao, killing off anyone and labeling them Abu Sayyaf or Moro terrorists. Sometimes, they trade gunfire with the Moro legitimate armed groups, the MILF or MNLF.

The military scours the countryside looking for “non-Muslim terrorists” – the Communists. Extra-judicial killings are now so rampant such that even the United States Senate is holding committee hearings on the subject.

It is understandable for institutions in The Hague investigate killings in the Philippines. But the United States of George W.?

Arroyo is back with her Red Scare tactics à la Senator McCarthy of the 50s in the US. Congressmen Crispin Beltran and Satur Ocampo are in detention for charges of rebelling against the Marcos regime.

The military is roaming the streets of Metro Manila, intimidating the residents of the depressed areas.

Crime suspects are paraded by the police, and even by the President herself, in front of TV cameras and hordes of media people. It is very basic in Philippine law that a man is innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Rampant corruption is everywhere – in all government agencies, including public schools like the University of the Philippines. Corruption, in its many forms, violate other people’s human rights in many forms like the right to due process or even the right to live since corrupt officials, directly or indirectly, cause the deaths of countless people.

“ROBIN HOOD” HOSTAGE-TAKER

Then yesterday, an owner of a day-care center held hostage 26 children – all pupils of his day care center — and 4 teachers. His ransom demand was for these children to have guaranteed education. Surprisingly, two politicians came to the rescue – Senator Bong Revilla and Gov. Chavit Singson who is running for the Senate.

And of course, with two politicians in the picture, it could only have a good ending.

A Moro, Mr. Bangcola, VP of AMA College, promised that his school will give the children guaranteed free education.

HELLO GARCI

But the worst was still to come. Virgilio Garcilliano, the COMELEC (Commission on Elections) commissioner who was caught on audio tape talking to people, including President Arroyo herself, about RIGGING the 2004 presidential and senatorial elections and even KIDNAPPING Moro families, has just signed up to run for CONGRESSMAN in Bukidnon, Mindanao.

Is he the kind of person the Mindanao settlers can be proud of?

This news really makes my spine shiver in horrible disgust.

When Iggy Arroyo claimed to be the real “Jose Pidal” with bank accounts in the US, instead of being investigated and jailed, he ran for Congress and won!

There is no more sense of shame in this country anymore.

http://jamalashley.blogsome.com/images/shockedfellow.gif

 See the animated video Hello Garci

 

March 27, 2007

WAR IN MORO LAND (Last Phase) — by Jun Abbas | # | History, Socio-Political, Bangsa Moro, Moroland, Religious / Cultural — jamalashley @ 3:07 am

March 31 is the birth anniversary of Macapanton Rashid  Yahya Abbas, Jr., my eldest brother. Among our siblings, I was probably the one closest to him during the years 1977-91. We were together in Saudi Arabia from 1977 to 1983and again in 1985. We were also briefly together in Paris, France. I also helped him put up an office in Kuala Lumpur in 1985. When he came back to the Philippines, he set up the SSB Holdings, Inc. SSB was practically a 2-man job. In his unsuccessful bid for the Philippine Senate in1992, I was his Campaign Chief of Staff. After the elections, our paths drifted apart. He concentrated more in Mindanao. The last 10 years of his life centered on his wife and children in Lanao and Metro Manila.

On 17 September 2003, Jun Abbas was, as far as I am concerned, murdered at the Makati Medical Center.

Returning from Mindanao after speaking and other official engagements, Jun proceeded to Makati Medical Center for an executive check-up. He was administered a massive dose of dextrose – 3 bottles within three hours – supposedly to lower his sugar count and to counter his alleged dehydration.  While the third bottle was filling his body organs with liquid, he coughed; and, later, he was gasping for breath. His wife, daughters and sister desperately called for a doctor but nobody came. They implored the nurses to call any doctor. Incredibly, NOT A SINGLE DOCTOR WAS AVAILABLE at the supposedly top-notch Makati Medical Center. Yet when it was all over for Jun, the doctors suddenly came rushing from nowhere.

When I later told my doctor-friends about it, they all said that Jun died of DROWNING. Nobody could survive such a massive dose of dextrose in so short a time.

A few weeks before this happened; Jun led a top-level Moro delegation to meet with President GMA. The Moros, which included almost all elected and appointed top government officials, demanded the ouster of a top Cabinet official, whom the Moros accused as responsible for escalating the war in Mindanao. GMA agreed and sacked the official.

After Jun’s passing away, that top official was back at the Cabinet.

————– 

For years, I had been telling him to write his memoirs on the Bangsa Moro revolution if he wanted history to recognize his central role in it. There are already many versions floating around.

Amazingly, just before he died, he submitted to Ateneo a long and rambling essay where he mentioned his role in the revolutionary movement. The Ateneo Law Journal editors must have realized the importance of such a document. They had it published immediately, including all the grammatical errors.

Jun Abbas’s last published article was

 IS A BANGSA MORO STATE WITHIN A FEDERATION THE SOLUTION?

(Ateneo Law Journal  Vol. 48  Sept 2003)
(Macapanton Rashid Yahya Abbas, Jr, was Full Professor at the King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in the mid to late 1970s)

 

Here is an excerpt from that article:

===========================

 

WAR IN MORO LAND (Last Phase)

The brief history of the present Bangsa Moro Struggle, which I will present in the first person because I was one of the original members of the movement from 1965 onward.  This is perhaps the first time I will be writing on this matter because I want the Bangsa Moro Youth and the Filipino People to understand the Islamic Struggle of our people while there are still some of the originators of the struggle who are still alive and involved in different capacities in the society.

Even before the Jabidah Massacre in 1968, the Muslim students organized on the national level, the CNI Scholars Association and the Muslim Students Association of the Philippines which started as social organizations.  In 1965, because of the Vietnam War and massive influx of settlers to Mindanao, the student leaders from UP injected these issues and started the militancy of the Muslim students.  The first issue to be questioned was the policy of “National Integration” because the Muslims believe that they can not be integrated culturally and socially to the Philippine society that is based on Christian values and acceptance, of Spanish colonialism as a blessing and heritage that resulted to the Christianization of the Philippines.  The scholars and the Commission on National Integration supported this position and what the country needed was “unity in diversity” and possibly a “federal system of government” since amendments to the constitution was on the national agenda for 1971.

The Muslim Youth organized that National Coordinating Council for Islamic Affairs (NACCIA) and issued a Manifesto entitled “Al Wahid” in 1967 calling on the Filipino leadership to pay greater attention to the miserable situation of the Muslims before rebellion will break out.  There was a massive influx of settlers to the Muslim areas and displacement of Muslims and Lumads was widespread.  The government was encouraging the immigration of settlers from Visayas especially from Negros provinces, Leyte, Samar, and Iloilo, because of the problems of the sugar plantation workers.  There were also massive logging activities denuding the Mindanao forests by concessionaires from Luzon like the Antoninos, Sarmientos, Valencias, Floreindos, Alcantaras, etc..  These new economic elite who were the agents of Korean, Japanese, US and European companies destroyed the forests of Mindanao which were preserved because of the failure to colonize the Bangsa Moro.  These groups that destroyed the environment are now the industrial and financial controllers of the region including installing their protégés in the political positions and even dictate policies for the Bangsa Moro.  The NACCIA warned that these economic aggressions against the Muslims in their homeland and political displacement will be met with armed struggle.  The government did not listen as usual.

In 1968, trainees from Sulu (Sulu and Tawi-tawi was one province then) in the Army were massacred by their officers at Corregidor when they demanded their pay and to return to their homes because they refused to go Sabah to infiltrate and start the rebellion to reclaim Sabah for the Philippines.  The Commanding Officer was Major Eddie Martelino, an alleged convert to Islam (who was later executed by the MNLF-Malaysians in Sabah after his capture sometime in 1978-79).  This incident led Congressmen Rashid Lucman, Salipada Pendatun and Salih Ututalum to demand congressional investigations backed by massive youth demonstrations which took over the Congress premises.  Only Congressmen Indanan Ani and Ali Dimaporo sided with President Marcos.

The Union of Islamic Forces and Organizations composed of all the National Muslim organizations under the leadership of Sultan Rashid Lucman was organized.  I was elected Secretary General.  My assignment was to organize the demonstrations.  I organized and led the demonstrations in front of Congress while Nur Misuari and Abul Alonto organized the sit-in at Freedom Park, Malacanang.  I led the demonstration in Jolo – the first and last anti-government demonstration of around 10,000 persons and in Cotabato City with the MIM and Marawi City with the BMLF leaders.  I was then Private Secretary to Commissioner Tamano at CNI, so, I filed my resignation which was not accepted, but I was allowed to go on leave of absence by Executive Secretary Rafael Salas because I refused to desist from leading the demonstrations.  I told him, “if Ilonggo soldiers were massacred, would you keep silent because you are in government?  He smiled and told me that he will inform President Marcos, and they will not take any action against me.  Despite my action, my brother-in-law was taken as the Muslim Senatorial candidate.  Maybe Marcos would have dealt with the Muslims properly if only Martial Law was not declared.  In that election, only Congressman Pendatun was returned to Congress because of massive fraud and vote buying which defeated the anti-Marcos Congressmen but a Muslim senator was elected in the person of Senator Mamintal Tamano.

The foreign trained top “90 has returned home and were welcomed by Senator Ninoy Aquino at Malabang, Lanao Sur.  The local training camps were established and the Top “90 became the trainors.  At that time, the secret organization was the Bangsa Moro Liberation Front (BMLF) which was later named Bangsa Moro Liberation Organization (BMLO) under Sultan Rashid Lucman and General Salipada Pendatun.  The Top “90 also secretly organized the Moro National Liberation Front headed by Nur Misuari and Abul Alonto.  The young Ulama, professionals and youth leaders were with the BMLF.  This was also the first time that Bangsa Moro was used to refer to the Muslims in the Philippines.  The MNLF used Moro only.  This came after the Muslim Youth National Assembly (MYNA) wherein, over 200 youth leaders met in Zamboanga City at the same time with the Muslim Association of the Philippines Congress in 1969.  Almost all the future leaders of the MNLF, MILF, BMLO and political leaders of the Muslims were present.

The MYNA debated independence or federation as the exercise of the right of self-determination of the Bangsa Moro people.  After two days, the vote that won was to participate in the Constitutional Convention election of 1971 and proposed a Federal system to get a Bangsa Moro state.  That is why, Nur Misuari, Mike Mastura, Musib Buat, Hussin Pangato of MIM, others and myself ran in the Concon elections and only Mike Mastura was able to make it due to massive cheating and vote buying to assure Marcos a majority.  The Federal proposal never saw the light of day in the Concon and the Constitution of 1973 did not contain any provision to respect Bangsa Moro right of self-determination.  Only Delegate Banjamin Abubakar of Sulu refused to vote for the approval of the Constitution and he truly represented the aspirations of the Bangsa Moro people and not the Muslim delegates who capitulated to Marcos.[1]

The 1970-72 period saw the escalation of violence between the Barracudas and Ilagas in Lanao Norte and Black shirts and Ilagas in the Cotabato massacres.  The Ilagas “rats” were paramilitary forces of President Ferdinand E. Marcos and supported by the AFP directly or indirectly. The Mindanao Independence Movement was organized by Datu Udtog Matalam, patriarch of Cotabato, in 1969 which led to the violent clashes and became the stimulus for the government and Christian militias to launch massacres against unarmed Muslims as in the Manile, Cotabato massacre of Muslims in a Masjid (mosque);  the Lutayan; the Tacub; the IPIL and the Pata, Sulu massacres etc.  The people of Buldon fought a battle against the AFP wherein the air force, artillery and tanks were used against a Moro town.  They fought until Mayor Tomatic Aratuc met with President Marcos and the government forces were withdrawn.  That time the President was the real Commander-in-Chief and was responsible for all the military assaults on the Moro Communities. 

This situation continued and the BMLF under Sultan Lucman and General Pendatun decided to file genocide charges against President Marcos at the UN and also at the OIC.  A Petition was filed with UN Commission on Human Rights, through the UN Office in Manila in 1971.  This was reported on the BBC world radio and was heard by Col. Ghadaffi of Libya who was then the new leader of his country and decided to respond.  He sent his Foreign Minister Saleh Buoyaser to Manila as a Professor to attend the World Universities Conference.  That was how the Bangsa Moro case was internationalized.  This led to the organization of the Islamic Directorate of the Philippines (IDP) where all the Muslim political leaders joined as well the youth leaders including the writer, Misuari and Salamat.  Dean Ceasar Adib Majul was elected Chair as non-partisan leader and this author Secretary General.

OIC RECOGNITION

As mentioned earlier, this author was sent as a lawyer to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in February 1972 at the Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers of the OIC.  He met with Secretary General Tengku Abdul Rahman and asked King Faisal Bin Abdul Aziz to mention the issue in his speech.  King Faisal also called Tun Abdul Razak to support the case, which Malaysia did.  Minister Buoyaser of Libya coordinated with the Moros and got the Bangsa Moro issue into the agenda for the next conference in Libya.  That was how the Bangsa Moro issue became the concern of the OIC from 1972 to the present – 29 years and still not finally settled.  When martial law was declared, the author was  arrested and detained at Fort Bonifacio.  In 1976, he went into exile in Saudi Arabia until 1987, after EDSA I upon invitation of the government under President Corazon C. Aquino.

In 1972, the Bangsa Moro clans led the fight against the military that were sent to the Moro areas to collect loose firearms which started with the October uprising in Marawi in 1972.  Later in 1973, the MNLF gradually took over the leadership of the armed struggle because of the weapons they were able to bring into Mindanao and logistics donated by supporters of the Bangsa Moro JIHAD. The OIC and many Islamic organizations and governments gave political and material support to the Bangsa Moro.  The OIC Foreign Ministers of Saudi Arabia, Libya, Somalia and Senegal came to the Philippines in 1973 and met with the President and agreed to work out a political solution.  They went to the Muslim areas up to Sulu.  In 1974, the burning of Jolo resulted when the MNLF fighters entered Jolo and a very big battle raged with naval bombardment ordered against Jolo in disregard for innocent civilian lives. 

As a consequence, the 1974 Islamic Summit was held in Islamabad, Pakistan.  The Summit declared that the situation of the Bangsa Moro Muslims was not an internal problem but a concern of the whole Muslim world.  This was demanded by the Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak.  The Bangsa Moro was allowed to convene in Marawi City by President Marcos. The Confederation of the Royal Houses of Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan led by its Chairman, Sultan Harun Al Rashid Lucman and this author as the Supervising Officer of the Presidential Task Force for the Reconstruction and Development of Mindanao, held the “Mindanao Policy Conference” and came out with a resolution demanding regional political autonomy. This was at the height of martial law and it became the political basis for the OIC to demand regional political autonomy and the demand for negotiations with the Bangsa Moro leaders and the MNLF at the 1974 Kuala Lumpur Conference of OIC-ICFM.  At this time there was only one leadership and organization – the MNLF.  The Bangsa Moro struggle got the support of the Muslim states and the first negotiation between MNLF and GRP was in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia hosted by the OIC in 1975.  Executive Secretary Alejandro Melchor led the GRP delegation.

NEGOTIATIONS WITH BANGSA MORO

In 1976, the government created a negotiating panel headed by Carmelo Z. Barbero to talk peace again with the MNLF.  The talks were held under the auspices of the OIC in Tripoli, Libya.  The peace talks resulted in the forging of the now historic Tripoli Agreement and recognized as the historic territories of the Bangsa Moro Darul Salam of the Sultanates of Sulu, Maguindanao, Pat-a Pagampong a Ranao, Rajah Buayan and Saragani or the areas almost corresponding to the Moro Province during the American occupation which is the whole of Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan except the Caraga Region.  To end the war, the areas of autonomy consisting of 13 provinces and cities therein were recognized by the GRP as the Bangsa Moro Homeland.  These are the areas which were later constituted as the SZOPAD - Special Zone of Peace and Development. President Marcos held a referendum on the areas of autonomy and reduced the area to 10 provinces and cities and established the Regional Commissions for Regions 9 and 12.  The violation of the Tripoli Agreement was from its inception and it was more honored in the breach rather in compliance.  In 1977, Hashim Salamat, the MNLF Vice Chairman for Foreign Affairs left the organization and formed as separate faction of the MNLF. After a few years when OIC did not recognize him, Salamat organized the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), emphasizing Islam instead of only political and economic grievance of the Bangsa Moro.

This split was later followed in 1982 when the Moro Peoples National Congress of MNLF led by Atty. Abdul Basit Harrid (Jibril Riddah) and Haji Napis Bidin ousted Chairman Nur Misuari and installed Commander Dimas Pundato as Chairman, supported by many active commanders in the Homeland.  Pundato was then Vice-Chairman of Misuari’s MNLF.  The BMLO and the Pundato faction later joined forces and established the MNLF-Reformist Group.  The group disbanded when Pundato joined the government as OMA Chief under President Corazon Aquino.  The reformist commanders who did not join the government like Cdr. Digo and Cdr. Iqra formed in 1999, the new MNLF-Islamic Command Council with Mujahab Hashim as Chairman and Cdr. Milham Alam as Chief of Staff.  Eventually, the four MNLF factions reunited and approved a constitution in Tripoli, Libya, April 2003.  They have not yet elected a Chairman and other officers.

TRIPOLI AGREEMENT 1976

The government implemented the Tripoli Agreement unilaterally in a manner that was in contravention with the letter and spirit of the said Agreement.  In 1986, President Marcos was deposed through “People Power” and Corazon C. Aquino ascended to the Presidency.  She did not honor fully the Tripoli Agreement according to MNLF – the only pact, treaty or agreement signed during the Marcos regime that Aquino refused to recognize despite the commitment of Ninoy Aquino, to fully implement the Tripoli Agreement and if autonomy would not work after ten years, he will support the independence of Bangsa Moro.  This author was present when this statement was made in 1982 because Sultan Rashid Lucman, General Salipada Pendatun and this author met with King Khalid Bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia with Ninoy Aquino at the King’s Palace in Taif, Saudi Arabia.   We also arranged and gave Ninoy his passport “Martial Bonifacio” which he filled-up at Sheraton Hotel, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in this author’s presence.

The author was able, with exiled Moro leaders in Saudi Arabia like the late Ambassador Mauyag Tamano, to convince the then OIC Secretary General Puzada to send a message to President Aquino recognizing her as the President of the Philippines in March 1, 1986.  This was five days after EDSA I and the forty-nine (49) Muslim states were the first to recognize the legality of EDSA I.  This fact has never been mentioned in the EDSA I history which is unfortunate because the Bangsa Moro conflict would have been settled much earlier.

President Aquino created a Constitutional Commission (ConCom) that drafted a new constitution for the country.  The new constitution contained a provision for the creation of an Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.  The new constitution was ratified in 1987 and a new Congress was established in the same year.  Art. X was the reason why the MNLF broke-off negotiations with President Aquino and the MNLF did not recognize the Organic Act.  The MILF adopted the same position and both boycotted the elections.  Majority of the Muslims rejected or boycotted the said Act. It was for this reason that the Act was ratified by only four (4) provinces.  The Christians and the Lumad’s (culturally indigenous groups) did not reject per se the concept of regional autonomy.

Senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr. sponsored the bill in the Senate- the “Organic Act for Muslim Mindanao” which was signed into law as Republic Act (RA) No. 6734.  The MNLF and MILF claimed that it was a betrayal of the Tripoli Agreement, a charge that Senator Pimentel refuted by claiming that the law implemented 99% of the Tripoli Agreement.  President Ramos in 1993 revived negotiations with Chairman Misuari to fully implement the Tripoli Agreement as a binding international obligation and commitment.  This was an admission that RA 6734 did not implement fully the Tripoli Agreement.  The Final Peace Agreement (FPA) was signed on September, 1996 between the MNLF/OIC and GRP in Jakarta and finally in Manila.

FINAL PEACE AGREEMENT (FPA) 1996

The FPA provided for the reorganization of the ARMM and the establishment of the Southern Philippines Council for Peace and Development (SPCPD) and its Consultative Assembly (CA).  The SPCPD was tasked with coordinating development programs and projects for Mindanao but the government failed to provide the necessary funds and support facilities to the SPCPD, the government had allegedly allocated FORTY ONE BILLION PESOS (P41B) but only Eighteen (18B) Billion Pesos had been disbursed according to SPCPD/ARMM officials form 1996-2000.  It also did not cooperate with the SPCPD in implementing the development programs and projects for Mindanao.  There was inadequate funding and later in the Senate Hearings the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) admitted that the total releases for ARMM were below P18 Billion under the term of Regional Governor Misuari and most of the funds were for personnel services for the devolved agencies.  There was nothing “Final” in the Agreement because it was subject to the “Will of Congress” and the “Dictates of the Executive.”

The creation of the Mindanao Coordinating Council had sidelined the SPCPD  (established by E.O. 371), which was created by President Estrada to be the arm of the Office of the President in the planning, recommendation, coordination and monitoring/validating nationally and internationally funded socio-economic projects in the SZOPAD areas.  The Chairman of the Consultative Assembly of SPCPD announced that there would be en masse resignations by the ASSEMBLYMEN because the MCC under EO 261, S.2000, and the SPCPD/ARMM were monitoring and validating agencies but were not represented in the council and no Muslim was appointed to the council.  This author was invited to address the First Joint Sessions of the ARMM-RLA and the SPCPD-Consultative Assembly on September, 2001 upon the invitation of Chairman Misuari at General Santos City. The creation of the MCC and non-implementation of the FPA and the failure to enact the Organic Act agreed to in the FPA was denounced and the resolution was forwarded to GRP and the OIC Fact Finding Mission of the OIC.  Fr. Eliseo Mercado claims that the SPCPD has been rendered virtually inutile as Chairman Nur Misuari has earlier declared. Without the SPCPD then, the FPA should be considered revoked at least by implication because there is no more implementing agency.  After the ratification last August 14, 2001 of the Organic Law, then the SPCPD was ipso facto abolished and the SPDA was abolished in 2002.

From 1999 to 2002 the government failed to fully implement the FPA in its substantive provisions as far as MNLF/OIC is concerned (later as evidenced by Resolution No. 02-30, May 30, 2003, 30th ICFM at Tehran, Iran). At the same time the negotiations with the MILF broke down and led to renewed fighting between government troops and this time, the MILF carried on the Moro armed struggle when the MNLF decided to stop fighting after they signed the FPA and its chairman became then ARMM regional governor and concurrent SPCPD chairman.  On the other hand, Joseph Ejercito Estrada was elected President in 1998 with the support of the MILF and many Islamic organizations because he signed an agreement with Ummah Party of Lanao del Sur to pursue peace and development and appoint a Muslim to the cabinet and other high positions.  He also announced that he would establish a Malacañang in the south as well as implement the peace process and the FPA.

AGREEMENT WITH MILF

In August of 1998, the GRP and MILF signed an Interim Agreement to continue the negotiations started with the GRP under President Ramos.  There was a lot of goodwill because the new AFP chief of Staff, General Nazareno was even endorsed by MILF and the MILF supported President Estrada on the week of the elections.  The President knew this, Presidential Adviser for Flagship Projects; Robert Aventajado even brought the reply of the President to Camp Abubakar and met with Chairman Hashim Salamat.  He later became a frequent visitor and gave socio-economic projects and infrastructure projects to MILF as confidence building measures and entered into an agreement making the area a zone for peace.  The GRP also entered into agreements with MILF acknowledging the major camps of the MILF and this was under President Estrada and not under President Ramos. Everyone was euphoric that peace was at hand and development and progress will follow as the peace dividends.  Later, the “all-out war” of President Estrada was launched against the MILF despite the signing of the Aide Memoire between the GRP and MILF.  The rest is history chronicled in blood in Mindanao and street protests all over the country.  It culminated with EDSA II and the ouster of Estrada. 

The new President, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo declared an “all-out peace” policy and dropped all the charges against Chairman Salamat and other MILF leaders and started new negotiations.  The new all out war against MILF was again launched by Secretary Angelo Reyes in February 2002 during the Eidul Adha prayers in the early morning of February 10, 2003 at the Islamic Center of the Buliok complex at Pikit, Cotabato after there was already a decision by both the GRP and MILF to meet at Kuala Lumpur to discuss the peace agreement.  Secretary Eduardo Ermita even said on TV that day that it was “tragic” because of the peace process was going smoothly.  The panels met at Kuala Lumpur for exploratory talks and came up with a Joint Statement on March 28, 2003.  This was after the Davao International Airport bombing on March 4, 2003.  The March 28, 2003 agreement was not implemented because of another bombing on April 4, 2003 at Sasa Port, Davao City.  Again Exploratory Talks were held at Kuala Lumpur and another agreement was made in June 21, 2003.  This was again not implemented because despite the two unilateral declarations of MILF to stop all offensive military actions on May 28 and June 12, 2003, respectively, the AFP did respond and military operations against the MILF forces continued. 

However, on July 18, 2003, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo announced the signing of the Ceasefire Agreement between MILF and GRP which was finally signed by MILF on July 20, 2003 because Chairman Al Haj Murad was in the mountain areas at that time, Chairman Hashim Salamat already died on July 13, 2003 and since Murad signed the Ceasefire Agreement, it is significant because he was already the Chairman of the MILF and the GRP signed through Secretary Eduardo Ermita, Chairman of the GRP panel.  The Coordinating Committee for the Cessation of Hostilities (CCCH) of GRP-MILF met for the IOTH- CCCH meeting at Cotabato City on August 4, 2003.  I was present as a guest being the Secretary General of the Philippine Muslim Leaders Forum.  The CCCH is now operational and they are working to organize the Local Monitoring Team (LMT’s) to enforce the ceasefire.  Malaysia is expected to send observers.

The ceasefire agreement between the GRP and MILF was signed principally because of the insistence of the Philippine Muslim Leaders Forum (PMLF) which is the broadest loose associations of Muslim elected and appointing Muslim officials with the government to stop military operations and enforce the ceasefire.

In a letter sent to President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo on July 16, 2003 by PMLF Chairman Deputy Speaker Gerry Salapuddin[2] presented the situation and urgent need for a ceasefire to restart the peace talks:

“The MILF officials met with U.S. officials for two hours yesterday and have discussed the relationship and time-line with the U.S. in the peace process.  They are also coordinating with Malaysia.  After our lengthy discussions, we have agreed that the PMLF will present to Your Excellency the herein suggestions to break the impasse.  I called Secretary Eduardo Ermita in the presence of the MILF officials and told him about these suggestions, and he agreed that this Memorandum be submitted today.

 “As agreed last June 21, 2003, once the GRP drops the charges and cancels the warrants and begins the phased redeployment of military forces in Buliok, which it has started with the return of the Islamic Center, and the MILF has internally ordered their men at arms to desist as they have desisted from offensive military actions, the GRP will Issue a SOMO soonest after June 23, 2003.

“Immediately, by June 28, 2003 the Coordinating Committee on the Cessation of Hostilities (CCCH) will be reconvened for the permanent ceasefire and reactivate the Local Monitoring Teams (LMTs).  The GRP CCCH Chairman shall be headed by a General from the AFP.  The meeting was supposed to be held on June 28, 2003 in Estosan Hotel, Cotabato.  Arrangements were to be made by Secretary Norberto Gonzales but the meeting did not push through because Sec. Gonzales left for Europe.  He rescheduled it for July 12, 2003 but he GRP panel was informed late and therefore asked for postponement.  It was rescheduled to July 18, 2003 but Malaysia is still waiting for the settlement of the Issue on the warrants of arrest and the MILF is also waiting for the SOMO of the GRP.

“In view of these developments, we agreed to propose that the meeting be held immediately between the GRP and the MILF wherein both parties will simultaneously declare the effectivity of the ceasefire agreement of June 21, 2003, convene the CCCH, and reactivate the LMTs.

“The Malaysians will now be requested to send the international monitoring teams to monitor the ceasefire in coordination with the CCCH and the LMTs.

“As provided in the GRP-MILF joint communiqué of May 6, 2003 signed in Malaysia, “the MILF and GRP shall from an Ad-Hoc Joint Action Group against criminal elements in order to pursue and apprehend such criminal elements.”  Furthermore, the Ad-Hoc Joint Action Group “will operate in tandem with their respective Coordinating Committees on the Cessation of Hostilities.”

“The U.S. can now be requested to contribute funds for the operation of the CCCH and the LMTs as well as discuss with the GRP-MILF the areas or projects where the U.S. can contribute the funds as offered.”[3]

Again, in the Memorandum sent by the author to Secretary Eduardo Ermita on GRP and MILF Negotiations dated July 17, 2003, where he amplified in the Memorandum of Deputy Speaker for Mindanao Gerry Salapudin and discussed the Minutes of the March 28, 2003 Joint Statement and the June 21, 2003 GRP-MILF understanding and the letter of US President Bush to Chairman Salamat, he stated that:

“3.        The Joint Statement of March 28, 2003 between the GRP and the MILF agreed on the following points:

 1.         Both parties reiterate their commitment to achieve a comprehensive, just and lasting political settlement of the conflict in Mindanao and resolve to undertake appropriate steps to pave the way for the resumption of the formal GRP-MILF peace negotiations;

 2.         Both parties reaffirm to implement effectively on the ground all past and existing GRP-MILF agreements.  Details of implementation shall be discussed by the Panels;

 Both parties agree to exercise mutual restraint to minimize, if not put an end to, violence in Mindanao;

 To normalize the situation and facilitate the early return of evacuees to their places of origin and allow rehabilitation to proceed, a new arrangement on the ground will be forged by both parties;

 The Philippine government takes note of the activation of the Bangsamoro Development Agency;

 Both parties agree to direct their respective Technical Committees to work on the Implementing Guidelines of the Joint Communiqué signed on May 6, 2002 to ensure that the peace process is not adversely affected by the presence of criminal groups in Mindanao.  The Technical Committees will meet within two (2) weeks from today;

 The parties agree to improve the existing mechanism for monitoring of the cessation of hostilities including the composition of an observer/monitoring groups as provided for in the Implementing Guidelines on the Security Aspect of the Tripoli Agreement on Peace of 2001;

 The parties reaffirm the provision on the grant of Safety and Security Guarantees to MILF leaders and members who are directly and principally involved in the GRP-MILF peace talks; and

 Both parties express their gratitude for the gracious hospitality of the Government of Malaysia in hosting and facilitating the exploratory talks and for continuing its support to the peace process.”[4]

“Under item no. 1, the “The phrase resolved to undertake steps” means the GRP agreed to undertake appropriate steps to cover the withdrawal of AFP troops from Buliok Complex and recalls of warrants of arrest issued against all MILF leaders and members.  The pull out and recalls will be conducted within 4 weeks from today.  While the term “resumption” means formal negotiation will be back on track but Malaysia has to be consulted as agreed by both parties.”  This item was again reiterated on June 21, 2003 between the GRP and the MILF under item no. 3(b), “In response to this positive development, the GRP has agreed to undertake the following:

Facilitate the judicial process, in coordination with the Department of Justice, leading to the lifting of the Warrants of Arrests filed against MILF leaders and the Reward bounties for the apprehension of certain MILF leaders;

Begin the process leading to the phased redeployment of military forces from the Buliok Complex”[5]

It is very clear that the commitment to recall the Warrant of Arrests against all MILF leaders should have been done within four weeks from March 28, 2003 which was April 28, 2003 by the GRP. In the June 21, 2003 Understanding mention again was made to facilitate the judicial process with the DOJ to lift such warrants and cancel the bounties.  In the understanding of June 16, 2003 between the GRP and the MILF, the lifting of warrants and bounties was an obligation of the GRP which they will consult with the principal and the GRP agreed to these points.  GRP has partially withdrawn from Buliok Complex and returned the Islamic Center to Datu Abbas Pendatun, Sanggunian Member of North Cotabato.

4.         In the June 21, 2003 understanding, the GRP stated that “The June 20, 2003 MILF Statement entitled “Policy Statement of MILF Chair Salamat Hashim Rejecting Terror as a Means to Resolve Differences” substantially responds to the need for the MILF to publicly condemn terrorism and terrorist organizations.”[6]  The GRP acceptance should have led to the GRP issuances of SOMO at the soonest possible time immediately after June 23, 2003.  A meeting of the CCCH was scheduled on June 28, 2003 at Estosan, Cotabato City to be coordinated by Sec. Gonzales and Atty. Ali.  The purpose was to re-establish the ceasefire under the agreement of June 2001 and reactivated the LMT’s.  The Malaysian Monitoring Team will be fielded to monitor the ceasefire all over the areas of conflict.  The GRP has already requested Malaysia.

6.         In the understanding of June 21, 2003, “On the issue of Chairman Salamat’s presence during the peace negotiations, the MILF noted that Chairman Salamat has made known his intention to be present during the finalization of the GRP-MILF Peace Agreement and on the actual signing of the said Agreement.

The GRP, noting that Chairman Salamat’s presence would be much preferred during the talks, will request for Chairman Salamat’s presence during the Opening Ceremony for the resumption of formal talks.”[7]  The MILF Panel informed the PMLF in our talks last June 15, 2003 that Chairman Salamat has agreed to be present in the Opening Ceremony as confirmed to you in the memo of the PMLF.

7.         Going back to the May 20, 2003 letter of Chairman Salamat to President Bush, this was actually the 2nd letter.  The 1st letter (January 20, 2003) was a reply to US Ambassador Riciardone when he spoke before the FCAP when he raised the questions: “The US Government’s desire to know “What the MILF want or how its (the problem) going to be resolved”.  The MILF said “We take this opportunity to inform Your Excellency that the MILF is a national liberation organization, with leadership supported by the Bangsa Moro People, and with legitimate political goal to pursue the right of the Moro nation to determine their future and political status.  As part of this process, we have an on-going negotiation with the Government of the Republic of the Philippines to arrive at a negotiated political settlement of the Mindanao conflict and the Bangsa Moro problem, through the mediation and tender of good offices of the Government of Malaysia.”[8]

8.         It is this letter that was answered by the Joint Statement of US President and Arroyo on May 19, 2003 and the speech of Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage explaining the new US Policy which was accepted by MILF of their May 20, 2003 letter.  The US President instructed Assistant Secretary of State James A. Kelly to reply on June 18, 2003 to the letter of Chairman Salamat dated May 20, 2003.  This letter was hand carried by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Mathew Dailey and met with the MILF officials.  The basic points of the letter are:

“The United States Government is committed to the territorial integrity of the Philippines.

“The United States recognizes that the Muslims of the southern Philippines have serious, legitimate grievances that must be addressed.

“The United States wishes to see an end to the violence in the southern Philippines and is working to assist the Republic of the Philippines in addressing the root causes of that violence.

“The United States is concerned about the links between the MILF and international terrorist organizations and asks that those links be severed immediately.

“The United States stands ready to support, both politically and financially, a bon fide peace process between the Republic of the Philippines and the MILF.

“The United States appreciates the notable work that the Government of Malaysia has performed in this connection over the last two years, and will not seek to supplant Kuala Lumpur; indeed, we week to work with the Malaysians for a successful peace settlement.

“The United States Government will not mediate between the Government of the Philippines, nor will it participate in the negotiations directly.  We have asked the United States Institute of Peace, a respected conflict-resolution organization, to encourage the negotiation process in coordination with the Government of Malaysia.  The USIP is ready to begin this task as soon as we have a clear signal from you as to your readiness to follow through.”[9]

This declaration of the US government addressed to the leader of a revolutionary organizations is a “First” for the US and World Affairs and also a “First” for the Bangsamoro Movement because MNLF Chairman Nur Misuari never received such a communication from the US President, particularly at this time when the United States has emerged as the only super power in the world.  This policy statement of the US President must be seriously considered by the GRP because of the proposed implications not only in the Philippines or Mindanao or the Asian but in the whole Muslim world.  The US offer of political and financial assistance to a bona fide peace process be properly accepted and understood.[10]

It is a rebuff to the peace process because it is considered by the United States as not bona fide or in bad faith.  Both parties must seriously evaluate their actions to restore confidence to the peace process.

9.         The assignment of the US government of the US Institute of Peace (USIP) is a direct involvement of the US government because the USIP is a Federal Institution funded by the US government since 1984 with the Congressional mandate and the Board of Directors are all appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate just like the members of the US Supreme Court.  They have already scheduled meeting with MILF and plan exchange of missions.

10.       It is imperative that the GRP and MILF must implement their agreements which are binding international obligations of both parties mediated by Malaysia in March 28, 2003 and June 21, 2003 particularly convening the meeting of the CCCH and simultaneously declare the resumption of the ceasefire under the agreement of 2001 and cancel all the warrants of arrests and bounties against all the accused MILF.  This is also the suggestion of the US as well as Malaysia and other OIC countries in support of the appeal of churches and other religious groups and civil society.  The conclusion of the US letter to Chairman Salamat clearly manifests the US concern for a peaceful political settlement:

“I note with satisfaction that the MILF has declared a temporary ceasefire, which I urge you to extend until a settlement is concluded.  Both sides need to refrain from actions that merely perpetuate the cycle of violence.  Neither side can win this conflict on the battlefield; however, both the MILF and the Republic of the Philippines can achieve a lasting victory for the people of Mindanao by coming to a settlement.”[11]

The two Memoranda played a vital role in convincing President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to declare the ceasefire on July 18, 2003, five (5) days after the death of Chairman Hashim Salamat which was only confirmed on August 4, 2003 during the resumption of the meetings of the CCCH to re-establish the ceasefire.

—————–
For a related post, see

The term Bangsa Moro and my brother,  

 

The end of an era

 

==================================

[1] Bangsa Moro Struggle for Self-Determination by Atty. Macapanton Y. Abbas, Jr. for The

    Muslim Youth Summit, The Executive Plaza Hotel, Malate, Manila, October 27-28, 2001

R.A. No. 6734 was the original Organic Law for ARMM and was ratified by only four

   provinces,  Sulu, Tawi-tawi, Maguindanao and Lanao Sur

 

R.A. No. 6734 was the original Organic Law for ARMM and was ratified by only four

   provinces,  Sulu, Tawi-tawi, Maguindanao and Lanao Sur

 
[2] Memorandum sent to Her Excellency Gloria Macapagal Arroyo by Deputy Speaker Gerry

    Salapuddin on the Peace Process dated July 16, 2003

[3] Salapuddin, Gerry, Memorandum to President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, July 16, 2003

[4] GRP-MILF Joint Statement, Exploratory Talks at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March 28, 2003

[5] Understanding of GRP-MILF Exploratory Talks at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, June 21, 2003

[6] Ibid. Understanding

[7] Ibid. Understanding

[8] Letter of MILF Chairman Hashim Salamat to President George W. Bush, January 20, 2003

[9] Letter from US Department of State signed by Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly for

    President Bush to MILF Chairman Hashim Salamat dated June 18, 2003. cited in the paper of

    Secretary Eduardo R. Ermita, “Role of the Bishops-Ulama Conference in the Peace

     Negotiations, Westin Philippine Plaza Hotel, August 18, 2003.

[10] Memorandum of Usec. Macapanton Y. Abbas, Jr. to Sec. Ermita on July 17, 2003 on the GRP-

    MILF  Negotiations

[11] Op-cit. Memorandum of Usec. Macapanton Y. Abbas, Jr.

March 25, 2007

An Ideal University of the Philippines | # | Socio-Political — jamalashley @ 4:55 pm


UP Oblation 

 

During the last elections for the UP Presidency, one of the candidates asked for my ideas on what UP should strive to become. I gave the notes below.

Unfortunately for UP, the current officials’ only concern is to make money for UP from out of the pockets of incoming new students. With the new tuition fees, I already met people who said they could not afford to enroll even though they passed the UPCAT. As you will read below, I made suggestions for revenue - generating projects which would not require tuition fee increase.

The standards of UP education need to be upgraded. The system must be changed. Tenured professors cannot be left alone to (mis)manage UP. They simply do not have the necessary experience to run world-class institutions of higher learning.

I am shocked at the way many UP professors think. They think that UP was made for them — the teachers and not for students. They even call the students "transients"! 

I have been to universities in the Middle East, Europe and Hawaii, and in all these places, students are respected. Only in the Philippines are students treated so lowly. The teachers have made the universities, especially the public ones, their kingdoms. At UP, even their houses, which are owned by the government, are passed on to their children!

At any rate, here are my ideas:

UP AS THE VANGUARD
IN THE KNOWKEDGE SOCIETY AND ECONOMY

While the world is increasingly becoming a knowledge-based society and economy, the Philippines appears to be retrogressing as evidenced by the nomination and election of educationally-challenged people to the highest posts of the land – senators, vice-president and president. Practically all Filipino enterprises are still essentially family corporations. And while we claim to be a land of smart and intelligent people, the world knows us better as a land of domestic helpers and skilled workers. Our engineers work as technicians abroad; and now, our medical doctors are training to be medical nurses so they, too can work abroad. The only way for the Philippines to catch up to the world is by becoming a knowledge-based society and economy, too.

Universities play a key role in knowledge-based societies and economies. In the Philippines, the University of the Philippines can and should lead the way inasmuch as it wants to call itself “the national university”.

Experts agree on four (4) interdependent elements that can spur the growth of knowledge societies and economies; namely, production of new knowledge, transmission of knowledge through education and training, knowledge dissemination though information and communication technologies and the use of knowledge in technological innovation.

A world-class university should excel in these endeavors. If these activities reach a level of excellence, these can be income-generating for universities and thus sustain their development.

PRODUCTION OF NEW KNOWLEDGE

UP must focus on the production of new knowledge through scientific research. The physical sciences and engineering colleges must upgrade its laboratory equipment and computer facilities. The engineering curriculum must be upgraded from applied engineering to the level of engineering sciences (with heavy emphasis on the physical sciences and higher mathematics.)

Faculty and students must be encouraged to do fundamental as well as applied research. Ideally, UP autonomous units would have Research Institutes staffed by professors without any teaching load. UP must have a strict rule on scholarship – publication of faculty papers in international scientific / academic journals. The “publish or perish” rule of American universities should be adopted by UP. All units in the UP system must be encouraged to publish journals, monographs, etc.

The UP units should also team up with relevant government agencies or industry to come up with academic and professional journals. In the US, many universities do not hire their own graduates in order to prevent what is called “in-breeding”. Graduates of other universities are hired in the assumption that they would bring in new knowledge. UP must minimize in-breeding and hire graduates of other universities, preferably from foreign schools or those who have work experience abroad. These people can bring in new knowledge or at least new perspectives on “old” knowledge.

With globalization and the internationalization of research, UP can link up with foreign universities and other institutions for the exchange of students and faculty to do research work. Science and Techno (S&T) parks should be established in UP campuses but these parks should not be just tax havens for foreign companies with UP as the source of cheap, technically-trained personnel. Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) can do that on its own. Companies, who wish to be part of the S&T parks, should have research, development and demonstration (RD&D) divisions. A company would have to link up with relevant UP colleges or departments and collaborate / cooperate on research works. Students can do their practicum or on-the-job training there.

Demonstration projects would be open to the public to attract attention to the parks to induce more companies to invest in the park or donations from institutions or grants from foreign donors. UP should develop close cooperation with government agencies like DOST, DOE and DENR, especially for research. There should be sharing of research data, equipment and collaboration in internationally funded research projects. Instead of UP professors individually doing extra curricular consultancies, there should be a systematic manner of harnessing the research potential of the faculty.

Masteral theses and doctoral dissertations must not be mere exercises in scholarship techniques. They must be geared toward production of new knowledge that will add productively to the world’s knowledge. These academic endeavors must be done not just within academic ivory towers but in cooperation with the outside world – corporations and other institutions which could make use of the studies and thus would agree to fund all or parts of the research. This way, UP can build up its laboratory and other research equipment inventory through donations, grants and fees to be given by these outside organizations.

American universities are known for their fundamental research which induces the industry to fund these research works. On the other hand, European universities attract the industry through their research in converting existing knowledge into new processes, products and technologies. UP can strive to follow both models although the latter would be more feasible.

For generation of greater revenues, studies must be made on how UP or its units and researchers could set up companies to apply the results of their research and to reap the benefits. And on how UP and its researchers could be motivated to identify, manage and use to its advantage the commercial potential of their research.

TRANSMISSION OF KNOWLEDGE THROUGH EDUCATION AND TRAINING

It cannot be overemphasized that the primary function of a university is to educate and train the students. A university without students is a research institute, not a university. The Filipino public gives money to UP so it can educate and train Filipino students. Yet the rights, privileges and benefits of the students are not always taken into consideration. Many students have complained that UP is not “student-friendly”.

Some faculty and staff even describe students as “transients” implying that their interests must lag behind the permanent sectors of UP; namely, the tenured professors and the non-academic staff. While individual students may stay for only a few years, the collective group that make up the studentry remains forever.

There is no university without students. It is the job of the university to make the best out of each student and this means providing the necessary environment to achieve that end.

Access to UP education

In a pluralistic society like the Philippines, educational barriers exist. Access to UP education is not open to all, and the barriers can be very subtle. Marginalized sectors should be given greater access to a UP education. This can be as simple as making UPCAT application forms available to everyone and to conduct UPCAT tests in far-flung places in cooperation with local universities. Admissions criteria must include non-academic factors with a view to giving affirmative action to cultural minorities who have very limited access to quality education. According to the Association of American Colleges and Universities (1995) study: “When diversity is characterized by patterned inequity and persistent marginalization of specific groups, it is a symptom of democracy’s failure, a sign of a society’s unwillingness or inability to confront continuing injustices" (AAC&U, 1995, p. xx).

Student Affairs and Campus environment

Faculty and staff have an obligation to create campus environments (both inside and outside classrooms) that are conducive to students’ successful completion of their educational goals. Diversity is characteristic of big universities.

The students from the provinces face different challenges from those who reside in Metro Manila. The Office of Student Affairs has to make itself more visible and pro-active to create meaningful educational and life experiences for the students. In a 1997 study by D.G. Smith and Associates they concluded, among others, the ff.:

1. Student affairs professionals need to become more culturally competent, to have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed to understand and work effectively with diverse groups of students.

2. Student affairs professionals should have a deeper understanding of the historical, legal, political, and administrative issues surrounding issues of access and student success and actively promote informed understanding of these issues in order to improve campus practices.

3. In light of the changing student population and their changing needs, interests, motivations and goals, student affairs administrators should regularly evaluate which services are offered, why they are offered, and who benefits from these services. This practice could yield valuable information about whether campus resources (from trained advisors to computing technologies) are fairly distributed among students, and in particular, how well they serve underrepresented students.

Reorganization of Knowledge

While there is an increasing trend in the diversification and specialization, there is also an increasing need for interdisciplinary studies to answer questions on sustainable development, risk management, etc. While some researches are getting narrowly specific, there is also a demand for “generalists” who can synthesize the various factors of a given situation. Line between fundamental and applied research is getting blurred. There is a great need for scientific and technical education, horizontal skills and continuing education.

UP must be seen as the major source of expertise in most fields of knowledge. Because of the knowledge economy and society, many firms are now engaged in peddling knowledge by conducting workshops and seminars. Consultancies, whose main commodity is knowledge or expertise in a given field, are a lucrative business. Because of the need for continuing education and development of horizontal skills, many corporations are conducting in-house education. This development is great for universities whose main business is knowledge.

UP should link-up with various institutions and corporations in order to provide them with knowledge – in the form of consultancies, or providing education and training modules for employees. Some UP units or departments are doing these but there is much room for expansion and systematization. This is a good source for revenues. There is money in the knowledge business. The only question is how to take advantage of it given the constraints of UP being a public university. One method could be the setting up of private foundations for each college or institute to be run by faculty members, graduate students, alumni and professional managers.

KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION
THROUGH INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES

The UP Open University should take the lead in distance learning using the power of information and communication technologies (ICT) to the fullest.

In the Information Age, there must be a free flow of information to level the playing field and promote faster development and greater learning. In the Philippines, information is still a tightly kept commodity. The National Library has old books and the borrowing process is so tedious. UP libraries, although set up and maintained by public funds, is off limits to outsiders except on certain days and after a tedious process of accreditation. UP libraries are guarded tightly. Students need to present their IDs in order to enter the sacred halls of UP libraries. In comparison, US and European libraries are usually open to the public, have accommodating librarians and very efficient service.

Since books and other informational materials are so precious to Filipino library custodians; then, perhaps UP can take the lead in creating virtual libraries. In this way, the real books and journals are kept safely in their shelves yet people can have access to them through the internet.

In knowledge societies and economies, information is widely accessible. The extensive use of ICT by the UP system can only enhance academic excellence as well as provide connectivity to the various units of the system. UP administration, faculty and staff must make full use of the internet network and the worldwide web. UP should publish online academic journals and publish UP works and achievements through the Web.

UP College of Mass Communication can take the lead in utilizing information technology through the mass media. It is thus imperative for UP to upgrade its ICT equipment and facilities in order to fully enter the Information Age.

SOME FINANCIAL QUESTIONS

The big problem of UP is its budget. Public funding is quite secure as the government is mandated to fund it. The focus then should be on how to make private donations to UP attractive in terms of legal taxation.

Another thing that needs to be considered is how to give UP the flexibility to allow it to generate revenues by marketing its services. UP has great resource potentials. Its huge land area can be developed and managed profitably. Its greatest resource – knowledge, is a marketable commodity, and has a booming market. With a bit of development, it can be even marketed internationally.

CONCLUSION

In fine, the world is fast becoming a knowledge economy and society. The Philippines must try to catch up with the word’s leading economies by becoming a knowledge-based society and economy. UP has the wherewithal to lead the country in that direction. It only needs a leader with a vision and a commitment to make UP a world-class knowledge institution.

=============================== 

References:

Association of American Colleges and Universities (1995). The drama of diversity and democracy: Higher education and American commitments. Washington, DC: Author. Smith, D. G. and Associates (1997).

Diversity works: The emerging picture of how students benefit. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2003) The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge Brussels

March 20, 2007

The Gulf War II media coverage | # | Media Studies, Socio-Political, Religious / Cultural — jamalashley @ 7:56 am

Four years ago, in March 2003, as an academic exercise on Media Studies, I analyzed the Gulf War II coverage by TIME magazine and the broadcast news networks.

TIME Asia Mar24 2003

This is still very relevant today. In that particular TIME magazine issue, the late Senator Blas Ople wrote a paean to “Mother America”. In the local TV coverage of the war in that period, the Filipino TV reporters were almost ecstatic in reporting American victory. I half expected some of them to suddenly break out in a cheerleading yell, “Go! America! Go!” And President Arroyo wanted to bask in the reflected glory of President Bush. She went on a series of TV interviews and even demanded airtime in the popular TV public affairs show “DEBATE”.

Now that a big majority of the American public, in agreement with most of the world, are against the Bush war on Iraq, I wonder what President Arroyo and the Filipino media people have to say about it.

Here is the report without the theoretical framework.

============================
 
INTRODUCTION

On 2 August 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait. A few days later, American top brass went to Saudi Arabia and showed the Saudi royal family satellite photos of massive troop movements – some 250,000 troops—along the Saudi-Iraq border. Consequently, Saudi Arabia allowed the US to bring in troops and military equipment to Saudi Arabia, the land of the two holiest mosques in Islam. On 17 January 1991, the US with troops from other countries launched a massive invasion of Kuwait in order to dislodge the Iraqi Army from Kuwait in accordance with UN Resolution 678. The media announced that such massive number of Allied forces, including 696,626 US troops, were necessary to fight Saddam Hussein’s million-strong army.

The invasion was swift. It was called a “surgical operation”. The Iraqi political opposition, including the Kurds and the Shi’as took control of all but 3 of the provinces of Iraq. Suddenly, without any warning, Pres. George H. Bush announced that the war was over. On 28 Feb. 1991, the US-led coalition forces left for home.

More than a decade later, the public the world over are still puzzled at what really happened in the first Gulf War. Where was the million-strong Iraqi Army that the Media said was in Kuwait? There were no reports of engagements with a significant number of Iraqis. US soldiers said that they didn’t see any huge number of Iraqi troops. Where were the 250,000 soldiers that were supposed to be in the Iraqi-Saudi border? Nobody saw them. Why did President Bush order an immediate halt to the war just when Saddam Hussein was certain to be defeated by the opposition? And why, after more than a decade of the US-led victory over Iraq, the UN economic sanctions still exist?

            Today, the world is witnessing another Gulf War. The antagonist is still the same Saddam Hussein; but, another George Bush, the son of George Herbert Bush, now acts as the protagonist. The supporting cast remains almost the same – Colin Powell, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc.  Can the people of the world expect to truly understand this event by having access to all pertinent information? Can the public expect the Media to tell them all there is to tell? Or will the people’s understanding depend on the “mediation” of the controllers of Media? Will the people witness reality as it happens – much like “reality TV” or pure documentary or will they be witness to nothing more than a representation of some reality, much like what a film does? Can the people expect coherence and a closure in the Gulf War, Part II or will it be as puzzling and open-ended as its prequel?

            The Gulf Wars problematize not only a war’s impact and wartime news reporting but also the socio-politico-religious culture/ideology of two world communities – the Capitalist West and the Islamic East.

            Culture is a site for hegemonic control. Stuart Hall’s cultural studies emphasize that production of knowledge is done by those who have power and those who contest that power. With the end of the Cold War, America finds itself as the only superpower. With a defence budget, according to published reports, of $322 Billion (larger than the combined defence spending of UK, Germany, France, China, Russia, Japan, Taiwan, North and South Korea, and others), the US needs someone to spar with to keep up its reputation as well as to help the wheels of its war economy moving…

… 

MEDIA COVERAGE of THE GULF WAR II

This report will study the current issue of TIME magazine (March 24, 2003) as to its coverage of the conflict. TIME magazine is the world’s leading international weekly magazine. TIME is part of the multi-media conglomerate AOL-CNN-TIME-WARNER. The very name of this conglomerate spells H-E-G-E-M-O-N-Y.

This report will also review the TV coverage of the war in the local channels in the first 4 days of the war – Mar 20-23, 2003.

SYNOPSIS

            From its Table of Contents, one can see at a glance the top two stories are “Collateral Damage: Asians condemn a US war on Iraq and dread its impact on the region” and “A Family Fight: The children of US soldiers deployed to the Gulf watch, wait and worry.” The third story is “State of Starvation: North Koreans thought life couldn’t get worse. They were wrong.”

            There are 2 more stories on Iraq and one photo essay. There is a related story about Bin Laden in the World section. For the Asia section, there is another story of North Korea and one on East Timor.

            There are articles on the Arts – Show Business, Movies, Books and Music. And of course, the Letters to the Editor Section.

           

CRITIQUE

            Keeping in mind that according to the critical theory thinkers, the dominant ideology is presented in the media as if it is the “natural” scheme of things” and that it is through pleasure that the dominant ideology naturalizes the scheme of things, TIME magazine must not appear as overly propagandistic. Reading TIME should be pleasurable. Therefore, the two sides of the Gulf conflict should be presented in the most pleasurable form, i.e., easy reading and interesting photographs.

 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

There are 20 short letters from readers all over the world. There are 3 letters about North Korea, 16 about the Gulf War II and 1 is an official Sri Lankan response to the magazine’s article on Sri Lanka in its Feb. 24 issue.

The Gulf War letters were divided into 5 sections. The first is on America and the War. Five letters were against the war with only one in support of it. However, the one supporting has a Muslim name (Mohammed Ragher) and is from Toronto (Canada is against the war.) In the second section (Faith without Fear), one is against war and another is for it.

In the ‘Assembling Against the War ‘ section, three readers were pro-war against one who was anti-war. The title of the section is a misnomer. The first letter begins with praise for the worldwide anti-war movement but ends with the oft-repeated reasoning of Bush that the war protesters must also direct their protest towards the atrocities of Saddam Hussein.

This line of reasoning is being used by Filipino opinion makers like Solita Collas-Monsod. President Arroyo used this line of reasoning when asked on TV by Rina Jimenez-David what she thinks of the consequences to the women and children of Baghdad. The use of a misleading title seems deliberate and might have been meant to attract the attention of readers against the war and then bombard them with 3 pro-war letters as against one anti-war letter.

The last two sections are about the French, the staunchest opponent of the Gulf War. The first letter is anti-war, followed by an anti-war but pro-US letter. The third is pro-war. The last letter, the only one in the last section titled “L’Etat, C’est Moi”, is pro-War and unabashedly anti-Chirac. The US hatred for France has gone to the point of calling French fries “Freedom fries”. They don’t want their favourite snack to be French.

 

COVER STORIES

            The primary cover story ‘Why Asia Fears Bush’s War’ is spread out in 6 pages, half of it occupied by photos and three sidebars. There is one very large photo of US soldiers in battle gear, one large photo of Muslims in a prayer protest in Pakistan and a small picture of a South Korean protester.

            The first sidebar indicated the Asian countries’ stand in the war. The second asks if Asia could be a dangerous place for expats once the war erupts. This is written from the perspective of a white expatriate, the modern equivalent of the old colonials. And the third is an article by the Philippines’ Foreign Secretary Blas Ople. It is titled “Why Asia Needs America.” It is a paean to America. The article is so shamelessly pro-US that the writer had to state that he “is not a running dog of America.” The two pro-West sidebars, which contain a photo each, practically balance out the anti-war sentiment of the cover story.

The other cover story is titled ‘An American Family Goes To War’ in 8 pages with photos of the Richardsons, an all-American military couple, in uniform and in domestic scenes. This is a great example of the style of war reporting mentioned above, i.e., promoting a populist perspective glorifying the ordinary ‘GI’ or ‘Tommy’ or the family on the home front. In the sidebar ‘The Full-Time Part-Time Soldier’, the story portrays a black reservist and his family.

 

IRAQ STORIES

            ‘Voices of Islam’ is a 2-page spread of the thoughts of 5 Muslim thinkers about the Gulf War. The five are unanimous in saying that Muslims may be anti-Saddam, but they are not pro-Bush. And Bush is pushing Muslim moderates to be anti-Bush and anti-West.

            A pro-war story ‘Enter the Cleanup Crew’ follows up the pro-war cover story ‘An American Family Goes To War’. This article again emphasizes Bush’s assertion that the war would be swift and that this is a humanitarian action more than a military offensive.

            A 6-page photo essay featuring Iraqi soldiers and citizens rounds up the Iraq stories.

 

KOREA STORIES

            President Bush named North Korea as part of the “axis of evil” along with Iraq and Iran. Unlike Iran, North Korea declared that it would continue its nuclear program in defiance of American wishes. To most observers, the US will get back at North Korea after it shall have taken cared of Iraq and Iran.  It is therefore not surprising that America is already waging a media war against Korea.

            In this TIME issue, Korea is given wide coverage – negative for the most part. The ‘Running On Empty’ and ‘Wargames’ articles fault Kim Jong Il’s despotic ways and his alleged dictum that “the earth does not need to exist if there is no North Korea.”

 

FINDINGS:

            If one were to enumerate the determinants of media constructions, one can easily conclude that TIME magazine cannot possibly present a very objective view regarding the Gulf War. The Gulf War is a war between primarily America and Iraq. TIME’s owners are primarily Americans and of the dominant elite. Its advertisers are either Americans or pro-Americans. The same goes with its readers.

            Although TIME is necessarily pro-US and pro-war, the techniques and codings it uses make it appear that it is objective and fair. The selection and placing of the articles and letters to the editor are such that there is an appearance of fairness and objectivity. The rhetoric of the photo images reflects American military power (but not too much, there must be some “equalizing” mechanism). The photos show American troops with high-powered long arms and a helicopter versus young Iraqi soldiers with assault rifles. American strength is balanced by the “domestic” photos of the Richardsons (An American Family Goes To War) and the Echols (Full time Part Time Soldier) with a cat and kids respectively.

            The stories mislead the readers into believing that there really is no hidden agenda. The true reasons of the war are not discussed. The issue of the control of the Saudi Arabian and Iraqi oilfields was not mentioned. The article on expats and Mr. Ople’s essay are not news but mere opinions.

            The North Korea issue complements the Iraq issue. Here, the magazine articles are more aggressive. On the banner of the cover, the title says: Putting the Squeeze on North Korea. The North Korea issue has not yet divided the world as the Iraq issue has. Therefore, the magazine can afford to pitch a hard sell.   

TV COVERAGE

            With the experience of the first Gulf War, international network stations were ready for this war. There is obvious censorship by the US coalition forces. Journalists are allowed to accompany the US troops. They are said to be “embedded.” As mentioned earlier, this tends to make the journalists highly favoring whomever they are with.

            There is quite a big difference between the Iraqi/Arab coverage over the Western coverage. The Arab networks show civilian areas bombed, dead civilian bodies, American prisoners, dead US soldiers.

            In the first three days (Mar.20-22), the Western media coverage did not show or mention any casualties despite reports of helicopter crash and bombing in the tents. They claimed that Umm Qasr and Basra were immediately secured with no fighting. <

The Western media also claimed that 8000 to 10000 Iraqi soldiers surrendered with 200 tanks.  But no videos or photos could confirm it. (Inquirer had a front-page photo of a couple of hundred Iraqis and was labelled as the 8000 surrenderees.)

On the third day, there were reports of resistance. Local correspondents in Kuwait and Iraq (like Mr. Buenafe) insisted that there was no resistance whatsoever. Filipino anchors and correspondents were so gung-ho about American success and would not even consider other opinions.

On the fourth day, Monday 3 am Manila time, the Anglo American command center in Doha finally gave a Press Conference. From that conference, one learned that there were on-going resistance in Umm Qasr, Nassarriyah and other places. There was absolutely no mention of 8000-10000 surrenderees. The US admitted having 2000 prisoners. They also admitted that some of their soldiers were captured, killed and missing in action. The US/UK forces were forced to have a press conference because the Iraqi officials presented to the media captured American soldiers.

One very interesting thing about the press con is that it was clear that even the media people in Doha were not certain of what was truly going on. One reporter said that they were given the impression for two days that there were no resistance in Iraq and absolutely no casualties from the Anglo American side. They were just as ignorant as the TV viewer in Manila.

Aside from the actual war coverage, the Philippine president asked to be separately interviewed by the different networks. The popular TV program DEBATE which invite prominent people to debate on national issues had to change its format and turn it into a press forum for Ms. Arroyo. The personalities usually interviewed by the networks are those that are pro-war.

FINDINGS:

            The TV coverage of local and international networks is not fair and objective. The side presented is mostly the side of the US/UK forces. Distortion of facts and outright falsehoods abound like the supposed surrender of 8000 – 10000 Iraqi soldiers with some 200 tanks, the non-resistance in Umm Qasr, Najjah, Nassiriyyah, etc. The Filipino anchors (Enriquez, Celdran, Davila, etc.) and correspondents (Linggao, Buenafe, etc.) freely editorialise and show their bias.

 CONCLUSION

            Media construction of reality becomes apparent in times of war. Media and other state apparatuses would be mobilized for war purposes. Opinions of the public and of the world at large must be molded and shaped. TIME magazine is doing its job perfectly well for the cause of Western capitalist hegemony. Perhaps some Arab magazines are doing the same job for the Iraqi cause. However, TIME has a global audience while no Arab magazine can come close to TIME’s scope, circulation and popularity.

            This bodes ill for the Arabs and the Muslims who are not regarded well by most of the Western countries and their subalterns. For the West and their subalterns, the Arab and Islamic World are still seen in Orientalist terms. The Muslim is the West’s Other.

            As for TV coverage, this Gulf War is showing us more facets of war reporting. It showed that even in this era of live TV, news could still be manipulated and controlled.  While in the first Gulf War, the Arab networks were not prepared, today; they seem to know how to play the game. It is very important that Third World nations must not rely too heavily on the First World media.

            There is a need to put the news in proper context. Research is very important. In this war, most people do not really know what it is all about. Objectivity may be passé but fairness should always remain as a journalistic standard. It must be emphasized that Objectivity depends not on the journalist but on the Method. Even a biased journalist can still put up an objective report if his/her methods are proper.

March 16, 2007

Democratic Matial Law? | # | Current events, Socio-Political, Philipine Elections, Bangsa Moro — jamalashley @ 8:03 am

 

 

Sun.Star Network Online - Military deploys soldiers in Muslim-dominated areas

 

 

        Can there be Martial Law in a democracy? 

        The country is in the midst of an election campaign, the supposed mark of true democracy. The American and French revolutions have put Suffrage on such a high pedestal. “One person, one vote.” “The rule of the majority.” These are the pillars of democracy.

        Yet in this supposed bastion of democracy in Asia, and with an electoral process going on, why are the military roaming the streets of the so-called depressed communities in Metro Manila?

        And why is a lawmaker, the representative of the biggest party-list in the country being hunted by the police? This is the only Philippine administration I know that has very little regard for congressmen. About two years ago, five or so party-list congressmen/women had to seek sanctuary in the halls of Congress so as not to be arrested. But one of their fellows, Mr. Beltran, was not so lucky. He was arrested and is still in detention.

        And why do so-called extra-judicial killings abound? Even the United States Senate is conducting hearings on the Philippines’ extra-judicial killings!

        The communists who have renounced armed struggle and opted for parliamentary struggle are now being killed or arrested by the government. Mr. Joma Sison of the National Democratic Front, who is a hard-core Communist ideologue, must be laughing his heart out.

        As for the military in the capital metropolis, the government’s justifications are ridiculous. The military, the spokesmen say, are there to help the communities. Instead of just staying in their barracks, the army men are now doing civic works for the people of these depressed areas. So, why do they carry their long arms?

        Are they supposed to make the people cower in fear so they would not vote for the Opposition candidates?

        And why is the COMELEC not doing anything to stop it? And what are the opposition candidates doing about these things? Well, they are busy engaging their rivals in silly TV debates and spending huge sums for the TV, radio and online advertisements.

        But most importantly, why is there no outcry from the people?!

        Even in ancient Rome where dictators ruled, the Army was forbidden to enter the city gates.

        In a press briefing, the Executive Secretary was asked what the military would gain by going to the Muslim areas in Metro Manila. Secretary Ermita, a former general, said that by going to the depressed Muslim areas in Manila, the military would get to know the Muslim culture. This knowledge would help them in their missions in Mindanao.

        Are the Muslims in Manila expected to welcome with open arms the military in their midst and introduce them to their culture knowing full well that these same soldiers will go and kill their fellow Moros in Mindanao? Surely, Mr. Ermita does not think the poor Muslims in Manila are that dumb.

        According to Sun Star online, Command Chief Ben Dolorfino said “the new program, dubbed Bridging Leadership, is meant ‘to bring solutions to the many problems in the Muslim communities.’" Isn’t that supposed to be the function of the government and its civilian agencies?

(See related post: Arroyo’s Red Scare)

March 15, 2007

100 Greatest Men | # | History, Socio-Political — jamalashley @ 5:41 am

From Michael H. Hart’s The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History, Revised and Updated for the Nineties. (New York: Carol Publishing Group/Citadel Press; first published in 1978, reprinted with minor revisions in 1992.)

 
Rank   Name                                                 Influence
________________________

 

1         Muhammad                                        Prophet of Islam; conqueror of Arabia;

Hart recognized that ranking Muhammad first might be controversial, but felt that, from a secular historian’s perspective, this was the correct choice because Muhammad is the only man to have been both a founder of a major world religion and a major military/political leader

2         Isaac Newton                                     physicist; theory of universal

                                                                  gravitation; laws of motion

3         Jesus Christ                                        founder of Christianity

4         Buddha                                               founder of Buddhism

5         Confucius                                           founder of Confucianism

6         St. Paul                                              proselytizer of Christianity

7         Ts’ai Lun                                            inventor of paper

8         Johann Gutenberg                               developed movable type;

9         Christopher Columbus explorer;            led Europe to Americas

10       Albert Einstein                                    physicist; relativity; Einsteinian Physics

11       Louis Pasteur                                      scientist; pasteurization

12       Galileo Galilei                                      astronomer; accurately described heliocentric solar system

13       Aristotle                                              influential Greek philosopher

14       Euclid                                                 mathematician; Euclidian geometry

15       Moses                                                major prophet of Judaism

16       Charles Darwin                                     biologist

17       Shih Huang Ti                                     Chinese emperor

18       Augustus Caesar                                 ruler

19       Nicolaus Copernicus                           astronomer, proponent of heliocentricity

20       Antoine Laurent Lavoisier                   father of modern chemistry; philosopher;

21       Constantine                                         Roman emperor

22       James Watt                                         developed steam engine

23       Michael Faraday                                 physicist; chemist; discovery of magneto-electricity

24       James Clerk Maxwell                          physicist; electromagnetic spectrum

25       Martin Luther                                      founder of Protestantism and Lutheranism

26       George Washington                            first president of United States

27       Karl Marx                                          founder of Marxism, Marxist Communism

28       Wright Brothers                                  inventors of airplane

29       Genghis Khan                                     Mongol conqueror

30       Adam Smith                                        economist; expositor of  capitalism;

31       William Shakespeare                           literature;

32       John Dalton                                        chemist; physicist; atomic theory; law of

                                                                     partial pressures   (Dalton’s law)

33       Alexander the Great                            conqueror

34       Napoleon Bonaparte                           French conqueror

35       Thomas Edison                                   inventor

36       Antony van Leeuwenhoek                   invented microscope; studied microscopic life

37       William T.G. Morton                           pioneer in anesthesiology

38       Guglielmo Marconi                              inventor of radio

39       Adolf Hitler                                         conqueror; led Axis Powers in WWII

40       Plato                                                   founder of Platonism

41       Oliver Cromwell                                 British political and military leader

42       Alexander Graham Bell                       inventor of telephone

43       Alexander Fleming                              penicillin; advances in bacteriology,

                                                                     immunology and chemotherapy

44       John Locke                                         philosopher and liberal theologian

45       Ludwig van Beethoven                        composer

46       Werner Heisenberg                             a founder of quantum mechanics; discovered

                                                                     principle of uncertainty

47       Louis Daguerre                                   an inventor/pioneer of  photography

48       Simon Bolivar                                     National hero of Venezuela, Colombia,

                                                                     Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia

49       Rene Descartes                                   Rationalist philosopher and mathematician

50       Michelangelo                                      painter; sculptor; architect

51       Pope Urban II                                    called for First Crusade

52       ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab                          Second Caliph; expanded Muslim empire

53       Asoka                                                king of India who converted and spread Buddhism

54       St. Augustine                                      Early Christian theologian

55       William Harvey                                   described the circulation of blood; wrote

                                                                     Essays on the Generation of Animals, the

                                                                     basis for modern embryology

56       Ernest Rutherford                                physicist; pioneer of subatomic physics

57       John Calvin                                         Protestant reformer; founder of Calvinism

58       Gregor Mendel                                   Mendelian genetics

59       Max Planck                                        physicist; thermodynamics

60       Joseph Lister                                      principal discoverer of  antiseptics which

                                                                     greatly reduced surgical mortality

61       Nikolaus August Otto                         built first four-stroke internal combustion

                                                                     engine

62       Francisco Pizarro                                Spanish conqueror in South America;

                                                                     defeated Incas

63       Hernando Cortes                                conquered Mexico for Spain;

        destroyed Aztec civilization

64       Thomas Jefferson                                3rd president of United States

65       Queen Isabella I                                  Spanish ruler

66       Joseph Stalin                                       revolutionary and ruler of USSR

67       Julius Caesar                                       Roman emperor

68       William the Conqueror                        laid foundation of modern England

69       Sigmund Freud                                   founded Freudian school of

                       psychology/psychoanalysis

70       Edward Jenner                                    discoverer of the vaccination for smallpox

71       Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen                     discovered X-rays

72       Johann Sebastian Bach                        composer

73       Lao Tzu                                            founder of Taoism

74       Voltaire                                             writer and philosopher

75       Johannes Kepler                                 astronomer; planetary motions

76       Enrico Fermi                                       initiated the atomic age; father of atom bomb

77       Leonhard Euler                                   physicist; mathematician;

78      Jean-Jacques Rousseau                       French philosopher and    author

79       Nicoli Machiavelli                               wrote The Prince (influential political treatise)

80       Thomas Malthus                                 economist; wrote Essay on the

                                                                     Principle of Population

81       John F. Kennedy                                U.S. President

82       Gregory Pincus                                   endocrinologist; developed birth-control pill

83       Mani                                                   founder of Manicheanism,

84       Lenin                                                  Russian ruler

85       Sui Wen Ti                                         unified China

86       Vasco da Gama                                  navigator; discovered route from

                                                          Europe to India around Cape Of Good Hope

87       Cyrus the Great                                  founder of Persian empire

88       Peter the Great                                   forged Russia into a great European nation

89       Mao Zedong                                       Ruler of modern China

90       Francis Bacon                                     philosopher , scientist

91       Henry Ford                                         developed automobile;

92       Mencius                                              philosopher; founder of a school of

                                                                     Confucianism

93       Zoroaster                                            founder of Zoroastrianism

94       Queen Elizabeth I                                British monarch;

95       Mikhail Gorbachev                             Russian premier who helped end

                                                                     Communist power in USSR

96       Menes                                                unified Upper and Lower Egypt

97       Charlemagne                                       Holy Roman Empire created

                                                                     with his baptism in 800 AD

98       Homer                                                epic poet

99       Justinian I                                            Roman emperor; re-conquered Mediterranean

                                                                     empire;

100     Mahavira                                            founder of Jainism

 

=========================

The Runners-up:

St. Thomas Aquinas; Archimedes; Charles Babbage; Cheops; Marie Curie; Benjamin Franklin; Mohandas Gandhi ; Abraham Lincoln; Ferdinand Magellan; Leonardo da Vinci. The other runners-up are simply listed, without further details or discussion.

===================

I have read Hart’s book a long time ago. If I remember correctly, the foremost criterion he used was the IMPACT of the man on humanity.

The Prophet Muhammad’s impact on 1 billion Muslims is quite obvious.

Jesus Christ was only number 3 because he has to share the glory with St. Paul (Saul of Tarsus), whose persistent proselytization spread the Christian faith all over the Middle East, Asia Minor and Rome. Constantine (No. 21), through the Council of Nicaea, has made Paulinian Christianity the dominant form of Christianity today.

From the list, one can infer that Religion (Muhammad, Jesus, Moses, etc.), Science (Newton, Einstein, Galileo, etc.) and War (Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler, etc.) have the greatest impact on humanity.

Mr. Hart obviously relied heavily on Western history. If he knew more of the Islamic civilization, he would have included Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin and son-in-law of Prophet Muhammad. He is not only the 4th Caliph, he is also the “Great Martyr” and Symbol of the Shi’a people – the people of Iran and millions more in Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere.

There are also the philosophers Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Ibn Rushd (Averroes). Without Ibn Sina and the other Muslim philosophers, the philosophy of Aristotle would have been forever lost to the Europeans.

Ibn Sina’s (Avicenna’s) magnum opus The Book of Healing is considered the largest work of its kind ever written by one man. It covered Mathematics, Logic, Psychology, Natural Sciences, Astronomy and Music. His Canon of Medicine re-introduced the scientific works of ancient Greek and Roman philosophers-physicians to Medieval Europe, which eventually paved the way for Europe’s Renaissance. These Muslims brought back Greek thought to Europe which ended the 1000 years of European Dark Ages and ushered in the Enlightenment.

It must be duly noted that after the fall of the Roman Empire, the barbarians and the Christians were against Science and Learning and closed down Plato’s Academy and all schools of learning in Europe. The Muslims, whom the Christians used to call Heathens and Infidels, were the ones who re-introduced ancient Greco-Roman thought to medieval Europe.

And there is Ibn Khaldun whose masterpiece The Muqaddimah , his introduction to his main book Universal History, laid down the foundations of modern sociology.

Of course, everyone would have his/her idea of the Top 100 Great Men. I would have a very different list.

I would put Leonardo da Vinci equal to or greater than Michelangelo (No. 50). And I certainly would put more literary writers. Their ideas filter down to the people much more than the philosophers’.

Also, I think Copernicus (No. 19) is highly over-rated. First, he was not the original proponent of a heliocentric solar system. Second, and more importantly, he did not fight for it. He was so afraid of the Catholic Church that he refused to have his book published until after his death.

Unlike Copernicus, Galileo fought for his beliefs.

And so did Rene Descartes (no. 49), who deserves a higher rating. He introduced the basics of the “Scientific Method”, which is still considered as scriptural by many social scientists in the world. The Cartesian worldview – ontology, epistemology and axiology – still predominates.

We still live in a materialist (Cartesian) world even though Physics had already made Galileo (No. 12) and Newton (No.2) passé.

The great importance given to the 17th-century gentlemen (Newton, Galileo, Copernicus and Descartes) means that 20th century humans still live under centuries-old beliefs and ideas. But Science had already advanced way beyond these thoughts.

Hopefully, in the 21st century, the ideas of Einstein (No. 10), Heisenberg (No. 46), Planck (No. 59), and Fermi (No. 76) would take root and take over the ideas of the 17th-century gentlemen named above. By taking root, I mean that the people’s concept of the nature of reality, of an individual’s relationship to the Universe, etc. would be based on scientific principles like Relativity Theory, Quantum Mechanics, Uncertainty Principle and even beyond like Super strings theory and M-theory.

Lastly, for the 21st century, three men have the greatest impact on a more practical level. Steven Jobs (Apple) brought the computer to people’s homes. Before Jobs, people (including those at IBM, HP, etc.) thought that computers were made for big corporations and universities and not for individuals. Jim Clark (Netscape) made the Internet and World Wide Web accessible to everyone. And of course, the world’s richest man, Bill Gates. His Microsoft is simply indispensable to almost everyone using a computer.

 

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Donncha O Caoimh